Special Education

Plan for Federal Autism Research Marked by Debate on Vaccines

By Christina A. Samuels — January 23, 2009 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

A high-profile employee’s recent resignation from a well-known advocacy group for people with autism has drawn attention to the work of a federal board charged with providing a strategic plan for the government on research into autism spectrum disorders.

The Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee was created through the 2006 Combating Autism Act. Among its tasks is to “develop and annually update a strategic plan for the conduct of, and support for, autism spectrum disorder research, including proposed budgetary requirements,” and submit that plan to Congress.

The advocacy world continues to debate whether vaccines may play a role in causing autism. Some advocates believe that preservatives like the mercury-based thimerosal—no longer used in childhood vaccines—or the combination measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination may play a role in causing autism in susceptible children. The federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says that there is no evidence, after multiple studies, that vaccines cause autism.

The coordinating committee took up the issue as a potential research priority, but voted on Jan. 14 to refer vaccine studies to the National Vaccine Advisory Committee, rather than recommend funding this year.

‘Credible’ Studies Cited

Alison Tepper Singer, who was formerly the executive vice president for communications and outreach for the New York City-based Autism Speaks, voted in favor of the move, which put her squarely against the wishes of the advocacy organization. She resigned the day before casting the vote.

“For some time, I have had concerns about Autism Speaks’ policy on vaccine research,” Ms. Singer said in an e-mail statement. “Dozens of credible scientific studies have exonerated vaccines as a cause of autism. I believe we must devote limited funding to more promising areas of autism research.”

Ms. Singer is one of six “public” members of the Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee, which works under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Her term ends in 2011. The panel also has 12 federal members, representing different government agencies.

Autism and associated disorders on the autism spectrum are characterized by impaired social interaction, problems with verbal and nonverbal communication, and unusual, repetitive, or severely limited activities and interests. According to the Atlanta-based CDC, about one in 150 children in the United States is diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder. An increase in the diagnosis rate of the disorder has made it a research priority and a challenge for schools.

In contrast to Ms. Singer’s views, Autism Speaks would like to see more research into possible links. In a policy statement, the group said such research is needed so that public trust in immunization programs can be protected. Active research is needed to determine whether there are “adverse events” from vaccines that affect neurodevelopment, if those effects are happening more often than before, if combination vaccines increase risk, and if certain subgroups are more susceptible than others, the organization said.

Priorities Skewed?

“It would be unprofessional to vote in a way that the organization wouldn’t want,” Ms. Singer said of her decision to resign before the committee’s meeting. “But it would have been disingenuous to vote against my conscience.”

Autism Speaks has withdrawn its support of the strategic plan put together by the committee.

According to Autism Speaks, Dr. Edwin Trevathan, the director of the National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities at the CDC, worried that the IACC might be duplicating efforts under way by other organizations.

Removing the vaccine-oriented studies leaves 40 others in the IACC’s strategic plan, with budgetary recommendations of about $789 million. The plan is now available for comment and will be sent to the new secretary of HHS.

Ms. Singer said she’s happy with the current research priorities, which focus on early warning signs of autism, research into treatment and appropriate services, and research into environmental causes.

But Ari Ne’eman, the president of the Autistic Self Advocacy Network, said the research priorities are tilted too much toward causation and prevention, and not enough toward quality-of-life service issues, which his organization supports.

“The focus on causation has been a source of real damage to the broader autism community,” he said.

A version of this article appeared in the January 28, 2009 edition of Education Week as Plan for Federal Autism Research Marked by Debate on Vaccines

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Assessment Webinar
Measuring What Matters: How District Leaders Are Redefining Student Assessment
In this panel discussion, district leaders and systems experts will examine the gap between the outcomes we want and the systems in place.
Content provided by Otus
Early Childhood Webinar Selling Into Early Learning: New Survey Data and Strategies for Marketers
Selling into PreK? Get fresh EdWeek Research Center data and strategies to position your products and reach the right early learning buyers.
Artificial Intelligence Webinar AI and 'Techlash' Are on a Collision Course. How Should Schools Respond?
Learn what strategies and tactics schools can develop to encourage smart and responsible AI use, while also enforcing tech guardrails.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Special Education Q&A How New Federal Guidance on Disability Could Impact K-12 Special Education
New federal DOJ guidance deemphasizing independent living skills could affect special education transition plans.
4 min read
Elaine Wilson, left, and Lois Curtis are shown in this April 10, 1999 file photo. States may have to place people with mental disabilities in homelike settings if they can fare just as well there as in state hospitals, the Supreme Court said Tuesday, June 22, 1999. The decision did not provide the final word in the legal battle of the two Georgia women who sued Georgia to get out of a state mental hospital in Atlanta. Elaine Wilson and Lois Curtis had been approved for community-based care but faced long waiting lists. Now in group homes, both women attended the Supreme Court arguments for their case in April.
Plaintiffs Elaine Wilson and Lois Curtis, shown here on April 10, 1999, during their Supreme Court battle, were the two Georgia women whose lawsuit established the landmark <i>Olmstead</i> decision requiring community-based care for adults with disabilities. The U.S. Department of Justice in July issued new guidance that said it will no longer rely upon the <i>Olmstead</i> decision in its enforcement of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
John Bazemore/AP
Special Education Little Chefs, Big Gains: Students With Disabilities Cook Toward Independence
Cooking helps the elementary students learn counting, build fine motor skills, and practice emotional regulation.
3 min read
Students get waffle mix for a chicken and Waffles cooking day in the classroom of Gabrielle Carpenter at the Daniel Webster School in Indianapolis, Friday, Oct. 2, 2026.
Students prepare waffle mix in Gabrielle Carpenter's special education classroom on Oct. 2, 2026, at Daniel Webster School 46 in Indianapolis. Carpenter uses the biweekly cooking lessons to teach the students independence, along with skills like counting and measuring.
AJ Mast for Education Week
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Special Education Whitepaper
Supporting Students With Dyslexia: A Practical Guide
Explore research-informed approaches to dyslexia support, from early recognition and accessible learning to literacy instruction, MTSS an...
Content provided by Everway
Special Education Cameras in Special Ed. Classrooms: Safety Measure or Privacy Invasion?
Cameras don't address insufficient teacher training, inadequate staffing, and poor behavior policies.
7 min read
A photo showing a CCTV security eye style camera monitoring students in a classroom. The classroom is blurred in the background while the camera is in focus.
iStock/Getty